Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Bloomburg v. State

Bloomburg v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 13, 1985 · Dell, Hersey, Walden
463 So. 2d 537; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12401 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bloomburg v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s extensive written statement contains sufficient, valid, clear and convincing reasons to support his departure from the sentencing guidelines and we affirm the sentence on the authority of Albritton v. State, 458 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

We find no merit in appellant’s second point on appeal. The record contains no support for the allegations made in appel*538lant’s untimely motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(f).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑