Loning v. Loning
Loning v. Loning
463 So. 2d 1208; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12295
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Loning v. Loning
Opinion of the Court
We affirm all of the provisions of the final judgment except that provision denying appellant’s request to change her legal name, and we remand the case to the trial court for purposes of granting the request for name change.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The testimony is undisputed that the wife, through her mother, contributed $25,-000 to the purchase of the second marital residence. Thus, I would hold that the trial court erred by failing to award the wife a special equity.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.