Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 19, 1985 · Barkdull, Jorgenson, Nesbitt

464 So. 2d 594; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 459; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Richmond v. State Title & Guaranty Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Greater Clearwater v. Modern Graphic (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Alpert v. Alpert (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The findings and recommendations of the master dated March 24, 1983 were not clearly erroneous, nor does it appear that the master misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. Consequently, it was error for the trial court to fail to approve and adopt those recommendations. Frank v. Frank, 75 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1954); Claughton v. Claughton, 347 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Finding all other points raised on the appeal and cross-appeal to be without merit, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court adopt the master’s March 24, 1983 recommendations in their entirety.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.