Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Weck v. Weck

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 27, 1985 · Barkett, Hersey, Walden

464 So. 2d 619; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Gold, Vann & White, PA v. DeBERRY EX REL. DeBERRY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Whiteside v. Whiteside (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. An order striking defenses entered pursuant to rule 1.380(b)(2)(C), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is an appropriate response by the court to “intentional delay and abuse of the system” by willful refusal to comply with orders pertaining to discovery, Georges v. Insurance Technicians, Inc., 448 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla. 1983).

HERSEY, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.