Byrd v. State
Byrd v. State
467 So. 2d 1093; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Byrd v. State
Opinion of the Court
After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.