Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Hill v. State

Hill v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 24, 1985 · Anstead, Glickstein, Walden
468 So. 2d 406; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1028; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hill v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but vacate his sentence and remand this cause for resentencing with directions that any re-sentencing be in accord with the sentencing guidelines or that separate written findings be entered if the sentence deviates from the guidelines. See Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 1985). The trial court is also cautioned that it is not proper to retain jurisdiction over a sentence imposed pursuant to the guidelines. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Knight v. State, 455 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.