Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth, 469 So. 2d 142 (1985)
10 Fla. L. Weekly 304; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12100
Barkdull, Nesbitt, Pearson

Millbrook Investments, N.V. v. Roth

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is reversed upon a holding that the causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are sufficiently pleaded so as not to be subject to dismissal; that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged their standing to bring such action; that the false representations allegedly made by the defendants are not, as a matter of law, nonactionable statements of opinion; and that there is no reason inhering in the alleged transaction between the parties which would legally preclude the action from proceeding.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
MILLBROOK INVESTMENTS, N.V., Mallville Investments, N.V., Ozone Investments, N.V., Saville Investments, N.V., Molbeston Corporation, N.V., Hatterway Corporation, N.V., all Netherlands Antilles corporations v. Kenneth W. ROTH, Executive Management, Inc., Arthur R. Scott, and Charles A. Forbes
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published