First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein
First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein
469 So. 2d 939; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1345; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14315
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
First State Bank of Lantana v. Goldstein
Opinion of the Court
Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by dissolving a writ of garnishment when appellant failed to appear for a docket call prior to trial. The court’s inherent power to manage its case load provides ample justification for the action taken.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.