Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Moore v. State

Moore v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 4, 1985 · Barfield, Booth, Wigginton
469 So. 2d 951; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1357; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Paula S. Saunders", Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Moore v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We vacate appellant’s prison sentence and remand for resentencing. After appellant’s probation was revoked, appellant elected to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court imposed a sentence of five years of imprisonment, a departure from the sentencing guidelines’ recommended sentence of any nonstate prison sanction, for the offense of burglary of a structure. The trial court failed to reduce to writing its reasons for departure from the guidelines. A written statement of reasons for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence is expressly required by Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Jackson v. State, 454 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Millett v. State, 460 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Johnson v. State, 462 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Hernandez v. State, 465 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

The sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.