Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed
Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed
471 So. 2d 159; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1482; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14628
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Chase Manhattan Financial Services, Inc. v. Weed
Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded for a new hearing on the issue of appellant’s entitlement to a deficiency judgment. There is no competent substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s denial of a deficiency award. However, rather than set the amount of the deficiency ourselves, we believe both parties are entitled to another opportunity to present evidence to the trial court as to the value of the secured property on the date of the foreclosure sale and the amount of deficiency, if any, to which appellant may be entitled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.