We agree with the appellants that a successor judge may not modify or otherwise disturb an unappealed final order of his predecessor permanently enjoining the use of a business name, see Metropolitan Dade County v. Certain Lands Upon Which Assessments are Delinquent, 471 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), see also In Re Estate of Beeman, 391 So.2d 276, 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and, accordingly, reverse the order of the trial court that does so.

Reversed and remanded.