Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Fernandez v. Colson

Fernandez v. Colson
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 16, 1985 · Nesbitt, Pearson, Schwartz
472 So. 2d 868; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1738; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14999 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fernandez v. Colson

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment is reversed because the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties agreeing to a mutual restraining order which was filed as part of the record constituted a “paper” within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). Thereafter, it was incumbent upon the movant to give notice for the application of a default. Due to this deficiency, it was not necessary for the movant, in seeking to vacate the default judgment, to establish either excusable neglect or a meritorious defense. See Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

The order denying the motion to set aside the default is reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.