Worth v. Mendez

Florida District Courts of Appeal June 26, 1985

Worth v. Mendez, 473 So. 2d 222 (1985)

1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15143

Anstead, Barkett, Walden

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Judge,

dissenting:

In my opinion the trial court should have set aside the default and allowed a trial upon the merits because movant clearly showed excusable neglect, plus the circumstances that he had a meritorious defense.

I would reverse.

Reference

Full Case Name: Neil E. WORTH v. Jose MENDEZ and Guadalupe Mendez
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published