Luben v. State
Luben v. State
473 So. 2d 293; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14756
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Luben v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant appeals his convictions for possession of controlled substances and possession of paraphernalia.
We find no merit in the appellant’s first point on appeal. As to the second point, we agree with the state that the appellant has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Nessmith v. State, 472 So.2d 1248 (1st DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.