Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Paez v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Corp.

Paez v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Corp.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 6, 1985 · Baskin, Ferguson, Hendry
473 So. 2d 298; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1923; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17479 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Paez v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court upon a holding that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1982); Johnson v. Gulf Life Insurance Co., 429 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Proprietors Insurance Co. v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Appellant’s failure to comply with contest terms set forth by appellee precludes recovery. See Endres v. Buffalo Automobile Dealers Assoc., 29 Misc.2d 756, 217 N.Y.S.2d 460 (Sup.Ct. 1961); Bowlerama of Texas, Inc. v. Miyakawa, 449 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.Civ.App. 1969); see also Webster Lumber Co. v. Lincoln, 94 Fla. 1097, 115 So. 498 (1927); Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. H. Baars & Co., 60 Fla. 630, 54 So. 92 (1910); Sullivan v. Economic *299Research Properties, 455 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, §§ 58, 60 (1979).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.