Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals
Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals
473 So. 2d 721; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1153; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13874
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Leatherwood v. Royal Oaks Rentals
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION
We withdraw our per curiam affirmance of December 19, 1984, and reverse the order quashing service on Royal Oaks Rentals. A motion alleging a defect in personal jurisdiction should set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate the defect in service and how the defect can be cured. See Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Over 30 Association v. Blatt, 118 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
We remand for further proceedings below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.