Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Cole v. State

Cole v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 9, 1985 · Jorgenson, Pearson, Schwartz
474 So. 2d 1267; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2108; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cole v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in any of the appellant’s points which concern the multiple convictions below. California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981); United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849, 103 S.Ct. 109, 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Parker v. State, 421 So.2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hernandez v. State, 323 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Cole’s sentences are modified so that the three-year minimum mandatory provisions imposed under section 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981) are to run concurrently rather than consecutively. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983); State v. Ames, 467 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1985); Wilson v. State, 467 So.2d 996 (Fla. 1985).

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.