Quince v. State
Quince v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects, except that we find the trial court erred in assessing costs against appellant, who had been adjudicated indigent, without notice and an opportunity to be heard, contrary to Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike from the judgment that portion thereof which orders the payment of $15.00 pursuant to Section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1983) and court costs of $2.00.
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing to note only that our decision in Quince v. State, 10 F.L.W. 1795 (Fla. 4th DCA July 24, 1985), does not prevent the state from attempting to tax costs against appellant in accordance with the procedure outlined in Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984).
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cedric QUINCE v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published