Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Hudson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 25, 1985 · Downey, Hurley, Letts

475 So. 2d 1018; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Nealy (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Gause v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from his judgment and sentence as a youthful offender contending that the trial court should have considered the sentencing guidelines. Recently, the First District in Braddock v. State, 472 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), addressed the issue now before this court and held that the trial court must utilize the sentencing guidelines. Consequently, we reverse and remand for correction of the sentence to comply with the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.