Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

State v. Pearson

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 15, 1985 · Barkdull, Hubbart, Nesbitt

476 So. 2d 760; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16314 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Uriguen (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
State v. Pearson (Fla. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court upholding the “knock and announce” Rule of Exclusion, as has the Fourth District Court of Appeal, See Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and as they have done, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public interest.

*761“Does the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule apply in probation revocation proceedings in light of the 1983 amendment to Article I, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution?”

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.