Sanchez v. Friesner
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Faro v. Romani (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Maria Sanchez appeals from an order on notice of attorney’s charging lien awarding appellee Herb Friesner $4,500. We agree with appellant that appellee is entitled to the value, in quantum meruit, of his services as limited by the contingency fee contract between the parties. Appellee Friesner obtained a settlement offer of $7,500 for appellant before withdrawing as her attorney. In accordance with the terms of the contingency fee contract, then, appellee is entitled to 40 percent of $7,500, or $3,000, which is the most he would have received if appellant had taken his advice and settled at that amount. Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 1983); Rosenberg v. Levin, 409 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 1982); Kopplow & Flynn, P.A. v. Trudell, 445 So.2d 1065 (Fla.3d DCA), rev. denied, 453 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1984).
Affirmed as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.