Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Carrion-Viscay v. State

Carrion-Viscay v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 3, 1985 · Hendry, Jorgenson, Schwartz
478 So. 2d 1192; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2663; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17164 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Carrion-Viscay v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence from which the defendant appeals are affirmed upon a holding that the prosecutor’s comment in *1193closing argument was proper in that it referred to evidence as it existed before the jury, White v. State, 377 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 845, 101 S.Ct. 129, 66 L.Ed.2d 54 (1980); Robles v. State, 210 So.2d 441 (Fla. 1968); Garcia v. State, 439 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Wilson v. State, 305 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and the sentencing court has the discretion to impose two consecutive life terms, each sentence including a twenty-five year minimum mandatory term, for two first-degree murder convictions, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. 1985); Price v. State, 477 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (on rehearing).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.