Pyszka v. Pyszka
Pyszka v. Pyszka
Opinion of the Court
Gina Pyszka appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded her $3,000 per month in permanent periodic alimony, one-half of the assets from the sale of designated properties after payment of all debts, including the mortgage on the marital home, and the marital home. The husband was awarded his partnership interest in his law firm and the assets remaining after all debts, including appellant’s attorney’s fees, are paid.
We have carefully studied the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in fashioning an equitable, if not perfect, award. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla. 1985); Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1985); Mullins v. Mullins, 460 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Affirmed.
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We modify the November 5, 1985 opinion to require appellee-husband to pay the income taxes on the award of permanent alimony. See Carroll v. Carroll, 471 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Otherwise rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.