Ramos v. STABINSKI & FUNT, PA
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Pianeta Miami, Inc. v. Lieberman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
- KONOVER REALTY ASSOCIATES v. Mladen (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
- Rosasco v. Rosasco (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
- Central Bank of Tampa v. United States (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1993)
- Olivera v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Anthony E. RAMOS, Appellant,
v.
STABINSKI & FUNT, P.A., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Minervino Rodriguez, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Robey & Pelstring and R. James Pelstring, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The non-final order appealed ordering defendant Anthony E. Ramos to place $20,000 in a trust or interest-bearing account pending further order of the trial court is reversed upon a holding that a disputed and contingent claim for money damages does not constitute, by itself, a sufficient basis for injunctive relief. Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1980).
Plaintiff/appellee Stabinski & Funt, P.A.'s contention that the order entered was a contempt order relative to the defendant's violation of a preliminary injunction entered in a prior case is without merit as the trial court expressly denied plaintiff's motion for contempt.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.