Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Prager v. MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY

Prager v. MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 4, 1986 · Hendry, Hubbart and Ferguson
483 So. 2d 881; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 556; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Prager v. MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

483 So.2d 881 (1986)

Elsie PRAGER, Appellant,
v.
MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 85-1134.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 4, 1986.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Miami, Stephen Nelson, for appellant.

Ponzoli & Wassenberg and Steven B. Sundook, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment under review is affirmed, as it appears without genuine material dispute that the defendant herein committed no act of negligence in this case. The plaintiff herein slipped on some dirt as she was walking in a large curbside flowerbox which was being constructed by the defendant on Miracle Mile in Coral Gables, Florida. The record affirmatively demonstrates that the unfinished flowerbox did not represent, in any sense, a dangerous condition for which a warning, as urged, was necessary. This being so, summary judgment was properly entered below for the defendant. See Clark v. Lumbermans Mutual Insurance Co., 465 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), pet. for review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1981).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.