Young v. Hertz Corp.
Young v. Hertz Corp.
496 So. 2d 175; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2073; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10152
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lambert v. Indian River Electric, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Lillian YOUNG, Appellant,
v.
The HERTZ CORPORATION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Gary Gerrard, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Adams Hunter Angones Adams Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of this court dated August 12, 1986, is withdrawn. We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for *176 consideration in light of May v. Palm Beach Chemical Co., 77 So.2d 468 (Fla. 1955).
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.