Ingram v. State
Ingram v. State
481 So. 2d 1006
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ingram v. State
Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated because of the trial court’s failure to provide written justification for its departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA), aff'd, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985). On remand, we respectfully direct the trial court’s attention to Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1985) (inappropriate considerations for departure); and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984) (notice required prior to imposition of costs).
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.