Cole v. State
Cole v. State
482 So. 2d 583; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6198
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cole v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reject appellant’s arguments relating to his convictions, as they are without merit. However, appellant’s argument relating to his sentences are well taken. Because the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentence without providing written reasons for departure, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing, as required by State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.