Olofson v. State
Olofson v. State
483 So. 2d 468; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 371; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Olofson v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
The trial court departed downward from the guidelines’ presumptive sentence with this justification: “Recommended sentence of HRS is felt to be adequate.” This is simply not a “clear and convincing” reason to justify departure. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1985).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.