Olofson v. State
Olofson v. State
483 So. 2d 468; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 371; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
The trial court departed downward from the guidelines’ presumptive sentence with this justification: “Recommended sentence of HRS is felt to be adequate.” This is simply not a “clear and convincing” reason to justify departure. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see also Santiago v. State, 478 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1985).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.