Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 25, 1986 · Barkdull, Ferguson, Nesbitt
483 So. 2d 557; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 506; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11484 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rodriguez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted. State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.