Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn, 485 So. 2d 484 (1986)
1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6999
Baskin, Hendry, Schwartz
Rosenblatt, Greene & Arnowitz, P.A. v. Flinn
Opinion of the Court
Finding that appellants were not afforded basic due process requirements of notice and opportunity to be heard, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corp., 392 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1981); Shaw v. Shaw, 455 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ROSENBLATT, GREENE & ARNOWITZ, P.A. and Stanley Rosenblatt: Conroy & Simberg and Bruce Simberg v. Gene FLINN Betty Vadala, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rebecca Vadala
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published