McCullum v. State
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- McCullum v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- & SC13-1065 Harold Blake v. State of Florida and Harold Blake v. Timothy H. Cannon, etc. Corrected Opinion (Fla. 2015)
- & SC13-1065 Harold Blake v. State of Florida and Harold Blake v. Timothy H. Cannon, etc. (Fla. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On the only point raised for our consideration, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecuting attorney, over the defendant’s objection, to play the defendant’s tape recorded confession to the jury during the rebuttal portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument where the recording itself had been admitted as evidence during the trial of the case and the replaying of it at this final stage of the proceedings was an appropriate response to the defense attorney’s closing argument. See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1219, 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.