Digangi v. State
Digangi v. State
488 So. 2d 626; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1125; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7814
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Digangi v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery and grand theft. He contends the trial court erred in imposing fines, restitution, and a public defender’s fee when he was indigent. The State concedes that the case must be remanded for a determination of appellant’s ability to pay. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Furthermore, the trial court should also correct the conflict between the oral pronouncement at sentencing and the trial court’s written order regarding the fine in Count II.
REMANDED FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT HEREWITH.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.