Charles v. State
Charles v. State
489 So. 2d 782; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7718
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Charles v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the appellant’s conviction and remand for a new trial because the trial court failed to hold the required hearing regarding the prosecutor’s admitted discovery violation. See Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).
REVERSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.