Heatherly v. Heatherly
Heatherly v. Heatherly
489 So. 2d 877; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1321; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8246
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Heatherly v. Heatherly
Opinion of the Court
Although we affirm the requirement that the husband pay the debts to Broward General Hospital and to Atlantic Ambulance Services, because they were pled and prayed for in the petition, the Final Judgment was in error in requiring the husband to pay any of the remaining debts since relief as to those debts was neither requested nor prayed for.
Accordingly, this cause is affirmed in all respects except for the provision of the Final Judgment requiring the husband to pay βall of the marital debts presently existing.β
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.