Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

King v. State

King v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 15, 1986 · Bar, Field, Thompson, Zehmer
490 So. 2d 85; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
King v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for correction of sentence based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.