Green v. Kiehne
Green v. Kiehne
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from what has been, in fact, an adverse final judgment Upon the merits, and a cross appeal by the defendants upon the question of attorney’s fees and an evidentiary matter. We reverse only that part of the final judgment which concluded that an enforceable contract between the plaintiffs and the individual defendant, Virginia J. Kiehne, did not exist, and remand for the determination of damages against said defendant arising out of its breach.
We affirm the cross appeal but direct that on remand the trial court not consider as elements of damages those which were the subject of the evidentiary ruling— namely medical costs, mental anguish, pain and suffering, and personal injuries. Such damages are not the natural and proximate result of a breach of contract.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents.
While I agree that the trial court ruled on the merits I also believe there is evidence to support the trial court’s judgment, and I would affirm in all respects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.