Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Efraimson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 27, 1986 · No. 4-86-0356 · Anstead, Downey, Glick, Stein

493 So. 2d 79; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1864; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Senior v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for post-conviction relief which claimed that insufficient reasons had been given by the sentencing judge for deviating from the sentencing guidelines. We affirm, not only because we find no error in the deviation, see State v. Baker, 483 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1986) and Ballard v. State, 11 F.L.W. 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA May 21, 1986), but because we believe appellant, who appealed his conviction and sentence but was unsuccessful, had no right to subsequently challenge alleged sentencing errors that could and should have been raised on appeal. Richardson v. State, 491 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.