Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

State v. Perez

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 9, 1986 · Bark, Dull, Hendry, Schwartz

493 So. 2d 547; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1929; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9637 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Fernandez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
State v. Ruiz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Of the two grounds upon which the trial court may arguably have granted the defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss, one, the failure to produce the alleged confidential informant, is foreclosed by State v. Gonzalez Rodriguez, 483 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited; the other, based upon the fact that payment to the c.i. was contingent upon the quantity of drugs seized as a result of his efforts, is contrary to State v. Prieto, 479 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.