Hooker v. Personal Representative of the Estate of Konrad
Hooker v. Personal Representative of the Estate of Konrad
493 So. 2d 1066; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9518
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hooker v. Personal Representative of the Estate of Konrad
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring in Part
dissenting in part and concurring in part.
I concur in the opinion of the court with respect to appellants, Lorraine McDonald and Susan Hooker. I dissent as to appellants, Gussie Russ and Frank Russ, and would reverse as to them because there is nothing in the record to connect Gussie and Frank Russ to the fraudulent acts set forth in the findings of the court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.