Collazo v. Gomolinsky
Collazo v. Gomolinsky
496 So. 2d 243; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2273; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10291
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Collazo v. Gomolinsky
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion to set aside a final judgment entered upon a default.
We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the final judgment and default upon a finding that there was no showing of excusable neglect. See Doctor’s Hospital of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison, 415 So.2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 422 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1982); Schwab & Co. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
No abuse of discretion having been shown, the order under review is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.