Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Day v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 5, 1986 · Barfield, Ervin, Wigginton

496 So. 2d 986; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2329; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Grimes v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Helms v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant brings this appeal from a sentence imposing court costs as a condition of probation pursuant to section 27.3455, Flor*987ida Statutes (1985). Implicitly conceding error, the State suggests that we resolve this issue in conformity with our holding in Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We agree with the State’s suggestion. Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of court costs on appellant and remand for further action in accordance with Lawton, including a hearing on the issue of indigency, pursuant to notice, and the issuance of appropriate orders thereon.

ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.