Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Livingston v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 20, 1986 · No. 86-557 · Dauksch, Orfinger, Sharp

497 So. 2d 998; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10693 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Livingston v. State (Fla. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in defendant’s contention that he was entitled to discharge under *999the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a), so his conviction is affirmed. That portion of the sentence imposing community service in lieu of $200 court costs on the indigent defendant is reversed because the crime for which he was convicted was committed prior to the effective date of section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). See Yost v. State, 489 So.2d 131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). We again certify to the Supreme Court of Florida the following question of great public importance.

DOES THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 27.3455, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985) TO CRIMES COMMITTED PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE STATUTE VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OR DOES THE STATUTE MERELY EFFECT A PROCEDURAL CHANGE AS IS PERMITTED UNDER STATE v. JACKSON, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985)?

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, QUESTION CERTIFIED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.