Miller v. Reinhart

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Miller v. Reinhart, 497 So. 2d 1332 (1986)
11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846
Anstead, Glickstein, Hersey

Miller v. Reinhart

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the trial court’s order disqualifying counsel for petitioners on the authority of Ray v. Stuckey, 491 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) and Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We grant the petition because we find no evi-dentiary support for respondents’ claim that counsel was an indispensable witness who would have to be called by petitioners or that counsel would offer testimony adverse to petitioners’ case.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arthur C. MILLER and A.C. Miller Concrete Products of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation v. Harry R. REINHART, Joann Reinhart, Ross R. Reinhart, Richard R. Reinhart, Scott R. Reinhart, and Todd R. Reinhart
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published