Wonder v. State
Wonder v. State
499 So. 2d 18; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11298
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wonder v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the affirmance of appellant’s conviction and disagree only as to the sentence imposed on the robbery charge. It appears that such sentence was improper under the holding of the supreme court in Irizarry v. State, 496 So.2d 822 (Fla. 1986).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.