Rich v. City of Mount Dora
Rich v. City of Mount Dora
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially:
The issue here, as I see it, is whether a city can be held liable for nuisance,
. The plaintiff’s action for inverse condemnation was dismissed and not appealed; his actions for trespass and negligence admittedly were unsupported by the evidence. Therefore, only his nuisance action is in dispute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.