Bravo v. State
Bravo v. State
499 So. 2d 71; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11141
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bravo v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the adjudication and sentence without prejudice to defendant raising the issue pertaining to ineffectiveness of counsel in a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The remaining point lacks merit. See Mixon v. State, 497 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.