Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Pilgrim v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 20, 1986 · No. 86-320 · Cowart, Dauksch, Orfinger

499 So. 2d 850; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pilgrim v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. It is the second appeal because we earlier quashed an improper sentence and remanded for resentencing. Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Because the trial court has once again failed to follow the dictates of the sentencing guidelines rules and statutes we must quash the sentence. Upon remand the trial judge is directed to impose a sentence of no less than five and one-half years and no greater than seven years imprisonment, probation or community control.

SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.