Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.

E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 26, 1986 · Dell, Glickstein, Gunther
501 So. 2d 1301; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 381; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10797 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant appellants’ motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.

Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑