Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1986

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 24, 1986 · Anstead, Glickstein, Walden
510 So. 2d 310; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 130; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11059 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the state has demonstrated that the error in receiving testimony concerning appellant’s constitutional right to remain silent was harmless under the test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑